



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 80-81
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Despite the fact that the dynamic markings of EF and PE, partially compatible in bars 80 and 81, are not entirely contradictory, they indicate rather different concepts. In the main text we follow the base text, i.e. PE, as the markings of EF were probably written by Fontana. Cf. bars 79-80. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 82
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The characteristic for this Polonaise markings of the portato articulation (dots under a slur), present only in PE, are certainly authentic. Cf. bars 8-10. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The long accent of PE, characteristic for Chopin, is one of a number of elements confirming the authenticity of this source. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||
b. 86-87
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider the dynamic hairpins of PE. Their simultaneous use with verbal indications, which apparently bear the same meaning, is characteristic for Chopin. The category imprint: Differences between sources |