Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 49

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No sign in JC & EF

 in PE

Possible interpretation of  in PE

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

b. 50

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No signs in JC & EF

  in PE

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 51

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No sign in JC & EF

 in PE

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 52-53

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No signs in JC & EF

  in PE

..

Dynamic hairpins in those bars are one of the improvements of notation in [A] (→PE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 52-61

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

Accent in JC

Accents &  in EF

Accents in PE

..

We give the accents appearing in PE over the chords on the 3rd beat of bars 52-53 and 60-61, which are beyond any source and stylistic doubts, in the main text. In JC, there is only the first of them, which is most probably meant to be understood as a draft suggestion of the same notation. The version of EF with  markings, which Chopin used only occasionally, must be considered to be non-authentic in this situation.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Fontana's revisions