data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
We give the accents appearing in PE over the chords on the 3rd beat of bars 52-53 and 60-61, which are beyond any source and stylistic doubts, in the main text. In JC, there is only the first of them, which is most probably meant to be understood as a draft suggestion of the same notation. The version of EF with markings, which Chopin used only occasionally, must be considered to be non-authentic in this situation.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Fontana's revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins