data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
It is hard to determine whether the slur was omitted in JC or added in EF. The concordance of slurs in EF and PE may suggest the first possibility. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Errors of JC |
|||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of JC , Inaccuracies in PE |
|||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The indication leggieriss., featured in PE, probably comes from [A] and constitutes one of a few improvements of notation introduced by Chopin into this autograph in the present bar. Cf. the remark concerning dynamic markings or slurs. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 20
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The slur linking the suspension with its resolution, which is evident from the point of view of phrasing, is featured only in PE. Cf. also the note concerning bars 20-21. category imprint: Differences between sources |