data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
According to us, lack of the ornament in PE is probably a consequence of the engraver's error who did not understand the notation of [A] or simply forgot to include a relevant sign. Therefore, in the main text we propose a possibility of considering a mordent (in this context category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in PE |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the vertical accent present in the base source, PE. In this context, the sign in EF should rather be interpreted as a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Vertical accents |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The indications cresc. or dim. placed inside the category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we consider the slur of PE underlining legato. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of PE, most probably drawn from [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources |