Issues : Wedges
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The staccato sign in EE and GC (→GE) is doubtless authentic. In our main text we give the wedge recorded in GC, as publishers often replaced Chopin's wedges with dots, considering the former to be inaccurate or hasty renditions of the latter (this was a rule for GE, cf. e.g. a characteristic of the B&H edition in the Nocturne in D category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||||
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the wedge that appears in GC and FE, which is almost certainly in compliance with Chopin's notation. In EE and GE, the staccato sign has the form of a dot (and GE has another dot added under the L.H. part). Cf. the note concerning bar 6. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Staccato signs in that bar and analogous ones occur very irregularly in the sources. For that reason we do not derive from them any general rule to be applied to similar places in the text. In this bar EE and FE have no sings. The wedge that can be seen in GC was reproduced in GE as a dot; another dot was added for the L.H. Cf. bar 113. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||||
|
b. 567
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A comma-like mark in GC, which here should be read as a wedge, was not - maybe by chance - included in GE. Neither EE nor FE have any mark in this place. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
major Op. 27 no. 2).
