mUltimate Chopin

Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

b. 82

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

A wedge in A

Without any sign in GE1 (→FE→EE)

A staccato dot in GE2 (→GE3)
..

We give the wedge written in A. In GE1 (→FE→EE)  the sign was omitted and a dot was added in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 88

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

An accent in A (→GE2→GE3)

No accent mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The accent above the note e1 present in A was omitted in GE1 (→FE→EE). The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 91-92

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

Slurs in A

The slur in GE1

No slurs in FE (→EE1→EE2)

The slur in EE3

The slur in GE2 (→GE3)
..  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Triplet slurs

b. 92

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

A probable long accent in A

A possible short accent in A

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)

An accent in the L.H. in GE2 (→GE3)
..

It is not clear what type of accent was used in A; it collides with the indication cresc., which makes it difficult to determine its shape. We consider a long accent to be more probable (cf. signs in the neighbouring bars). Omission of the accent mark in GE1 (→FE→EE) is definitely an error. The accent was put back in GE2 (→GE3), yet  ascribing it to the L.H. chord seems unfortunate.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 98

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

An accent in A

No accent in GE (→FE→EE)
..

The accent above f flat1visible in A was omitted in GE (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE