b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
We add a staccato dot over the 2nd crotchet of the bar, by analogy with bar 42, in which the appropriate mark does appear, possibly added by Chopin himself. The dot was also added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The long accent written by Chopin in A was reversed in GE1 (→FE) so that it resembles small crescendo hairpins. In EE that reversed mark, difficult to understand in the context, was omitted altogether. GE2 introduced a short accent, yet assigned it to the sixth in the L.H. That latter inaccuracy was corrected in GE3 category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Sign reversal |
||||||||||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
in A is written after the accent, yet still in bar 104. A comparison with similar bars suggests Chopin's inaccurate notation probably caused by lack of free space for entering the fortissimo under the octave f2-f3. In GE1 (→FE→EE), was placed at the beginning of bar 105. In our opinion, Chopin's notation was correctly interpreted in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
There is no slur in the sources. We suggest adding it , following the example of bar 42. category imprint: Editorial revisions |