mUltimate Chopin

Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 83-84

composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

Slur end in A (→GE→FE→EE)

A less probable reading of A
..

The moment when the slur ends is not quite clear in A. For the reasons discussed in the note to bars 79-80 we consider it much more probable that Chopin intended the slur to reach B on the 2nd beat of the bar. This is also the interpretation given by GE (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 83-86

composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

The slur in A

Slurs in GE (→FE→EE)
..

Both the slur end in bar 84 (the last one in the line) and the slur beginning in bar 85 are notated in A in the manner that indicates uninterrupted slurring. Yet in GE (→FE→EE) those slurs were reproduced as separate ones, which - considering consistent two-bar slurs in bars  75-82 and 87-88 - may be deemed acceptable.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 84-85

composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

A possible reading of the slurs of A (→GE→FE), slurs in EE3
 

The slur of EE1 (→EE2)
..

In A (→GE→FE), the slur at the end of bar 84 does not match the slur in bar 85 that opens a new system. The slur in bar 85 is drawn as a new one, not a continuation. This inaccurate notation may be interpreted in two ways:

  • the way Chopin notated the slurs in bars 76-77; that version can be found in EE3; 
  • the way in which the slur in bars 80-81 are notated; that version appears in our main text as the simplest one. 

In EE1 (→EE2) the slurring discrepancy was resolved by omitting the slur at the end of bar 84.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 90

composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

Slur ending in A (→GE→FE→EE)

The editors' proposition
..

In the sources, the slur ends above the 2n quaver of the bar. This probably results from the inaccurate notation of A.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 92-94

composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major

 Slur end in A

GE (→FE→EE)
..

In bars 92 and 94, despite the unambiguous notation of A, in GE (→FE→EE) the slur end was placed earlier, above the 2nd quaver of the bar. Cf. the note to bar 6.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE