Issues : GE revisions
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The lack of a staccato dot for E flat must be considered Chopin's oversight in A (→GE1→FE), as all the remaining bass notes in the accompaniment of that type do have dots. The reason for such inaccurate notation could be corrections, the traces of which are visible in this place in A. The dot was added in EE and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 70-72
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The change of piano to in EE had practically no impact on the sense of that indication; meanwhile, moving it in between the staves in GE2 (→GE3) may suggest that it applies to the L.H. as well, which is definitely not what Chopin intended. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE), the slur in bar 72 reaches up to a flat1 on the 3rd beat of the bar, which is not in line with A. The inaccuracy was corrected in GE2 (→GE3), and another slur was added connecting a flat1 to the minim in bar 73, probably by analogy to the authentic slurring in bars 76-77. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 88
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
A has a single bar line here. Chopin sometimes used double bar lines but did not add them automatically to indicate changes of key, where their significance is mostly conventional. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 90-96
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE2 (→GE3), grace note slurs linking the grace notes in bars 90, 92, 94 and 96 with the following crotchets were arbitrarily added. category imprint: issues: GE revisions |