Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The sign that was clearly a wedge in A was reproduced as a dot in GE (→FE→EE). See the characteristics of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 15-19
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A, the accents on the 3rd beat in bars 15 and 19 are clearly longer than the remaining accents in bars 13-20. In GE (→FE→EE) that difference was considered insignificant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE1 (→FE), Chopin's indication dolce was abbreviated to dol., and in EE it was omitted. Moreover, in GE (→FE) that term was placed - inconsistently with the notation of A – between the staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||
b. 22-28
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In those bars, the pedal release marks are placed at the end of the bar in A, after the 3rd crotchet in the L.H. In GE1 (→FE→EE) all the marks are printed under the 3rd crotchet, which may suggest - against A – the necessity of rhythmical release of the pedal at that moment. The notation of A was restored in GE2 (→GE3), with the exception of bar 24. The problem also occurs in bars 29-36 and 57-68. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A, the dynamic mark in bar 24 is so short that in GE1 (→FE→EE) it was mistook for an accent. However, what contradicts that interpretation is the placement of that mark in A: it is entered after the note, which is hardly ever found for accents in Chopin's autographs (a very similar sign in bar 36 was read in GE as diminuendo hairpins). GE2 (→GE3) have here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |