Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 249-250

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Continuous slur in A (→GEFE,EE)

Separate slurs in IE

..

The divided slurs in IE are probably an inaccuracy related to the transition to a new line.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

b. 249-250

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No fingering in A (→GEFE,IE)

Fingering in EE

..

In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 250-253

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

..

In A there are no accidentals to the 1st quaver in bar 250 and 253. In the main text we add cautionary flats, necessary in this context. In bar 250 a flat was also added in GE (→FE,EE,IE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 252

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Chords without b in A

Chords with b in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

Sonically and pianistically speaking, both versions are equal. Therefore, at first glance, it is not obvious why Chopin should have abandoned the idea of repeating the chord unchanged, as it is in all analogous places (the omission of the bottom note at the end of bar 248 results from the high position of the L.H. figuration). On the other hand, the A version is not a mistake that occurred at the stage of writing this manuscript – all chords in this bar were planned in this form by the writing person, which is evidenced by the difference in the level at which the ledger lines are placed – in the chords without b, they are placed lower than in the previous ones, hence there is no space for writing this note. However, this fact does not completely rule out Chopin's possible mistake, as it could have happened earlier, in the draft autograph (lost), e.g. while introducing possible corrections. In the main text we keep the A version, as Chopin could have wanted to refer to the chord between bars 149-150. The version of the editions, which does not differ from the remaining analogous fragments in terms of regularity, can be considered an acceptable variant. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Errors of A

b. 252-253

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Slur to 4th quaver in A, literal reading

Slur to a3 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

Slur to b. 253, our suggestion

..

The A slur must be inaccurate, as it only reaches f3 – cf. the endings of the analogous slurs in bars 244-245 and 248-249. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a slur to g3 in bar 253, modelled after those slurs. In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the slur was routinely revised by extending it to the end of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions