



b. 240-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Chopin extended the A slur for it to reach the f2 crotchet. Therefore, the version of the editions resulted from a totally unjustified arbitrary decision by the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 240-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing e2-f2 slur in GE (→FE,EE,IE) is either an oversight or a revision – making one's work easier by omitting a slur on the stave, which requires greater precision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
It is unclear whether the A mark is to be understood as a long accent or as a diminuendo – both versions seem to be musically acceptable. In the main text we provide an accent due to the shape of the mark, closer to accents. Moreover, according to us, the beginning of the tenor voice motif, emphasised by a slur, is another argument for an accent. In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the mark, extended between both crotchets, is definitely a diminuendo. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 242
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 242-243
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |