Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 206

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

from 3rd quaver in A & EE

 from 1st quaver in GE (→FE,IE)

..

The coincidence concerning the range of the  hairpin between A and EE is most probably accidental – the inaccuracy of the engraver of EE levelled out the action of the engraver of GE (→FE,IE), who prolonged the mark.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 209

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

 from b2 in A

 from b1 in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

The earlier starting point of the  hairpin in GE (→FE,EE,IE) is an inaccuracy due to a routine interpretation of this kind of marks by the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 215

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Wedge in A, literal reading

No mark in A (literal reading→GEFE,EE,IE)

..

The notation of the 2nd L.H. crotchet is unclear in A – it seems that is has two stems, one pointing upwards, and the other one pointing downwards, as well as a wedge under the note. However, the alleged stem pointing downwards is probably only an element resulting from the motion of writing a note on a ledger line (cf. bars 9 and 12, as well as 133-134), hence we could assume that we are dealing here with an E note provided with a wedge and with a stem pointing upwards. On the other hand, the version with a stem pointing upwards is incorrect in this case, while the wedge is questionable if we take into account the clear dots written under or over the bass notes in this and the next bars, which leads to the following hypothesis: Chopin wrote this E note with a stem pointing upwards, then, willing to change its direction, he prolonged the line running downwards with the help of the alleged wedge (forgetting to delete the top stem). This is how it was reproduced in GE (→FE,EE,IE), which we provide in the main text.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in A , Partial corrections

b. 216-217

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

5 staccato dots in A

4 wedges in GE (→IE)

Wedges in b. 217 in FE

No marks in EE1

4 dots in EE2

..

In the main text we reproduce the 5 staccato marks – undoubtedly dots – entered into A. In GE (→IE) the mark at the beginning of bar 217 was omitted, while the remaining ones were reproduced as wedges. The absence of the marks in FE (bar 216) and EE1 (in both bars) is due to the engravers' mistakes. In EE2 marks were added in the places in which they are present in GE, yet dots were used, as in bar 215.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 218

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No marks in A

2 wedges in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

Performing the crotchets in this bar staccato, as in the preceding bars, seems natural, hence highly likely. However, Chopin did not mark it, as one can imagine a change to the kind of articulation due to the possible continuation of crescendo; in the main text we leave this issue to the discretion of the performer.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions