



b. 171
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 172-175
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we provide the L.H. part as written by Chopin in A. GE (→FE,EE,IE) arbitrarily changed the layout of the quaver beams and flags to make it symmetrical with the R.H. part. According to us, the notation used in the editions, although inauthentic, seems to be better suited for the representation of the organisation of voices in this place, in particular emphasising the sequence in the bass as a separate voice is more natural than emphasising the tenor voice. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 172
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
A look at the dense GE1 notation allows us to say that the energico indication was placed in GE (→EE,IE) under the L.H. part only due to the lack of space between the staves. In FE the indication was omitted, probably due to inadvertence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 172-173
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The change of the range of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 174
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A Chopin omitted the naturals to the 2nd and 3rd L.H. quavers (a1 and A); on the other hand, he wrote unnecessarily repeated naturals to a2 on the 3rd quaver and to e2 on the 7th R.H. quaver. In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the omitted accidentals were added and the unnecessary ones removed, which we include in the main text. Moreover, in the editions cautionary flats were added to B category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |