Pitch
b. 43-55
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In this entire fragment, in the R.H. part led mainly in octaves, accidentals before both notes are present only in 3 of them – d1-d2 in bar 44 and 50 and e1-e2 in bar 52. Among the remaining octaves that require the use of accidentals, the majority of them feature an accidental only before the top note, while only three before the bottom note – b1 in bars 53-54 and d2 in bar 54. All necessary accidentals were added by GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 45
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to the E-e octave and naturals to the d1-d2 octave. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The illogical GE version (→FE,IE), in which the c1-f1-a1 chord at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar is a crotchet and is assigned to the bottom voice, resulted from a misunderstanding of the A notation, which is actually misleading. The manuscript can be interpreted twofold:
The EE version probably resulted from an unfinished attempt at correcting the GE notation – the aim was one of the versions described above, yet the middle notes of the chord were not printed. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The comparison with analogous bar 210 suggests that the absence of the e1-g1 minim filling the first octave is due to Chopin's oversight. However, it is not obvious, since in A one can see here traces of erasures corresponding to such a minim. However, according to us, it does not have to mean that Chopin wanted to have here a d1-d2 octave without harmonic filling. It could be that the correction concerned an erroneous or an illegible version of notation that was then to be filled with the aforementioned third; on the other hand, it cannot be excluded that Chopin considered using a different version of the middle voice. Anyway, an unfinished correction seems more likely than a bare octave, which would be against the clear textural plan of the last eight bars. Taking into account the above, in the main text we provide the unquestionable version of bar 210. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |