|
b. 100
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the flats lowering the g minim to g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 101-102
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we omit the inauthentic L.H. part fingering added by EE. The difference between the two EE impressions was caused by the fact that the authentic layout of the 2nd half of bar 101, in which the group of 4 L.H. quavers is written on the top stave (changed in the main text, yet kept in the transcriptions of the sources), confused the reviser preparing EE2. He assumed that the EE1 fingering, aptly suggesting that these quavers are to be performed by the L.H., was erroneous and changed it to the fingering adjusted to the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 101
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a slur after analogous bar 103. Chopin, particularly in the early period of his oeuvre, would often try to write slurs from the side of noteheads, even in a several-part texture (cf., e.g. the A slurs concerning the R.H. quavers in bars 97-98 and 100). However, there were times when he would omit slurs that were too difficult to write due to the layout, as in the discussed situation or in bar 99. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 101
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add 4 cautionary naturals – to F-f and f1 at the beginning of the bar and to g1 in the 2nd quaver. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 102
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dots probably represent the initial version of articulation of these crotchets, which Chopin replaced with slurs. It is indicated by the A notation in bar 104, in which the dots over the 2nd and 3rd crotchet were overwritten with a slur (leaving the dot over the 4th crotchet must be considered an oversight in this situation). In the discussed bar all 3 dots present along with slurs remained unremoved, hence in the main text we provide them in a variant form (in brackets). Being convinced of our hypothesis, one can choose the version of the editions, devoid of these dots. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Partial corrections |
and the penultimate d2 quaver to d
