Slurs
b. 153-154
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we provide the A slur in its literal interpretation. However, the interpretation adopted by the editions is by all means reasonable and recommendable as such, particularly in the face of numerous inaccuracies of A in terms of slurs – see, e.g. the note on bars 148-153. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 156
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 158
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The beginning of the slur must be inaccurate in A; however, it is uncertain whether Chopin wanted the ending of the slur to encompass the B1-B crotchet. In the main text we provide a slur reaching this octave, assuming that both endings of the slur are similarly inaccurate in A (too short). However, the version of the editions can be considered an equally valid interpretation of this slur. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 160-162
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the range of slurs introduced by GE (→FE,EE,IE) illustrates the manner of adjusting slurs (and dynamic hairpins) to easily perceptible rhythmic structures, in this case halves of bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 163
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be an oversight by the engraver of EE1, corrected in EE2. In FE the indications in this bar were adjusted to the next two ones – see the note in bar 165. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |