



Pitch
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The FE1 version must be erroneous, which is proven by the unfounded category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 (→EE1) the 3rd L.H. crotchet is a C instead of B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The FE1 version must be erroneous, which is confirmed by the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
According to us, the mark getting increasingly shorter in FE and EE – in EE the mark is actually a long accent – resulted from inaccuracies in the recreation of the respective bases ([FC] and FE). It could have also been Fontana committing an inaccuracy in [FC]. However, it must be said that a possible difference in significance between these marks is marginal, since in the Chopinesque notation a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |