b. 172
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin almost certainly added to A after [FC] had been finished. This is supported by the absence of four other dynamic indications in this and the previous sections in FE – in bar 164 and 168 and cresc. - - in bar 174 and 178. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 172-177
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The L.H. slurs in bars 172-173 and 176-177 were added – almost certainly by Chopin – at the stage of proofreading FE1 or earlier to [FC]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 174-178
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In bars 174-175 and 178-179 we introduce the arpeggio marks added – certainly by Chopin – to [FC] or at the stage of proofreading FE directly into the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin added the cresc. - - indication to A after the basis for FE had been finished, that is [FC]. In GE it was reproduced inaccurately, omitting the dash at the beginning of bar 175. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 176-177
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in bars 172-173, in the main text we add arpeggios on the basis of the Chopinesque proofreading of FE1 in analogous bars 85-86 and 89-90. Taking into account the fact that bar 85 is identical to the discussed bars, there are no doubts that arpeggios should be used also in this case. category imprint: Editorial revisions |