b. 162-163
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin must have added the two pedal changes within this two-bar section to [FC] or while proofreading FE1. The comparison with analogous bars 75-76 and 242-243 suggests that Chopin committed a mistake while writing the A pedal markings concerning the discussed bars, confused by the L.H. part shorthand notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 162-163
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The second L.H. figure in bar 162 and both in bar 163 were written in A with the use of shorthand notation with / marks. In GE and FE (→EE) they were written out in full. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated notation of A , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 164-168
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The marks in bar 164 and 168 were most probably added by Chopin to A (→GE) after the basis for FE, that is [FC], had been finished (cf. further dynamic indications absent in FE in this fragment, in bar 172, two cresc. - - in bars 174-179 and in bar 180). The second hairpin was added by EE2 after comparing it with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 164
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Like the previous ones, the L.H. slurs were almost certainly added to A after [FC] had been finished, which explains their absence in FE (→EE1). In EE2 they were added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 164-169
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in bars 77-82, moving the semiquavers in bars 164-166 and 168-169 beyond the 3rd quaver of a respective L.H. triplet was an arbitrary change by the revisers of GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Dotted rhythms and triplets |