Pitch
|
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A and FE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we give the A version (→GE), analogous to the version in bar 168. The FE version could be considered a Terzverschreibung mistake if it were not for the fact that it is musically reasonable and could have been introduced by Chopin into [FC] or while proofreading FE1. Such swinging motion of the figuration topmost notes can often be seen in Chopin's pieces, cf., e.g. the Variations in B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats to a category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||
|
b. 245
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the bottom note of the 1st R.H. quaver is a g3 instead of f3. The mistake was corrected in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 245-249
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
At the end of bar 245 and 249 in the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
to the 4th L.H. quaver. The patent oversight was corrected in 
, Op. 12, bars 192-195, Bolero, Op. 19, bars 155-167, Sonata in B minor, Op. 58, I mov., bars 41-47. Therefore, this version can be considered an equal variant.