Pitch
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As before, in the 2nd half of the bar Chopin did not write accidentals in the R.H. part in A (→GE1). This version was also repeated by FE1, while FE2 (→EE) added both naturals. GE2 added only the latter (a3), probably assuming that a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The chord featuring a 4th note, c1, is most probably a mistake in the interpretation of the manuscript committed either by Fontana in [FC] or by the engraver of FE1. In all 10 analogous places the chord played in the middle of the bar is an exact repetition of the chord from the beginning of the bar, but an octave higher. In the discussed place this rule is also observed in the A version (→GE). Determining the presence of a middle note of a chord written on a ledger line is a frequent issue when interpreting Chopinesque autographs (this also applies to Fontana's copies). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||
|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
|
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||
|
b. 228-230
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in previous similar passages, in the 2nd half of bar 228 and 230 Chopin did not write accidentals in the R.H. part. This version was repeated by FE1, while in FE2 (→EE) and GE flats were added to the 2nd and 4th quavers (c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
to a2 is not necessary, since in the 1st half of the bar there are naturals both to a1, written at the same pitch as the discussed note, and to a2.
to a was overlooked. The mistake was corrected in