Slurs
|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin would encompass rests within phrases with a slur a number of times, e.g. in bar 245 and 249. However, this is not that kind of situation, hence the continuous FE slur is almost certainly a mistake, perhaps resulting from the inaccurate slurs of [FC]. It was considered a mistake already in EE. In the main text we give the unequivocal A slurs (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in the preceding bar, the continuous FE slur (→EE) is most probably a misunderstanding in the interpretation of [FC]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 244-245
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The slurs were most probably added to A after [FC] had been finished – hence their absence in FE (→EE1). In EE2 the slurs were added on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
|
b. 260-261
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The absence of slurs in FE (→EE1) probably means that Chopin added them to A after [FC] had been finished. In EE2 the slurs were added after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 261-262
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in bars 94-95, the difference in the slur's range probably results from the inaccurate interpretation of the 'encompassing' A slur, yet this time the excessively long slur appears in FE (→EE). In the main text we provide the A slur, compliant with the phrase structure, correctly interpreted in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Embracing slurs |
