|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In FE a G-f seventh was printed by mistake instead of an F-f octave, which was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In the main text we suggest adding a wedge over f3. The next two such marks indicate the way the notes ending particular semiquaver groups should be played, both in this and the next bar, hence the omission of a respective mark over the first note of this kind must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. A wedge was also added in EE, whereas in GE the second mark was also overlooked, over a2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The FE slur is inaccurate – it ends between the 4th and 5th semiquaver. We reproduce it – as in GE and EE – as a slur encompassing the 1st beat only. On the other hand, in the main text we suggest a slur encompassing the entire R.H. figure, in accordance with the subsequent figures. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The missing mark in EE is most probably an oversight. By contrast, the change of the wedge to a staccato dot in GE resulted from general revision carried out in this edition – see the note in bar 7. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
to f3 at the beginning of the bar.
