Slurs
|
b. 86-87
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The slur in A in bar 86 (at the end of the great stave) clearly suggests a continuation, which is however not proved by the slur in the new line in bar 87. The separated slurs are compatible with the phrasing clearly inscribed in bars 3-6. The constant slur in GE1 is a consequence of unclear notation in A. It can be assumed that the manuscript sent for EE also had a similarly ambiguous notation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Overextending slur |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 91-92
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We interpret the beginning of the slur in A according to the remaining analogous places. In the editions the starting point is written one quaver earlier. In FE and EE the slur runs only to c3 on the 4th crotchet of the bar. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 92-93
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
Beginning the new line in A contributed to the imprecise slurring at the transition between bars 92 and 93. According to us, it is more probable that the slur in bar 92 is supposed to end on the d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
We adopt the slurring of A (→GE), although from the point of view of the performance practice, it does not make any material difference. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 94-95
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The beginning of the slur in A is unclear: probably it should start from the 2nd quaver. In GE and EE the slur begins from the sustained c2. FE continues the slur from bar 93. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
2 crotchet. In 
