Issues : Errors in FE
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE a bass clef was mistakenly introduced at the beginning of the new line. It is an obvious error, as one line above, at the end of the previous bar, the change of clef to the treble one was correctly indicated. The clef was corrected in FES and FEJ. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 105-106
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE the accents in the L.H. on the 1st quaver in bar 105 and on the 1st and 7th quavers in bar 106 were overlooked. EE has vertical accents here, which are certainly an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Vertical accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The arpeggio in the L.H. was probably overlooked in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 117-119
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In FE the slur in bars 117-119 was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 121
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The sources differ in the rhythmic value of the chord. We give the most natural in this context value of the crotchet present in FE and EE. It cannot be excluded that while writing the quaver in A, Chopin mistakenly copied the version in bar 117. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
