Issues : Long accents
|
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The interpretation of accents in A is particularly difficult in that bar, as neither the graphic analysis nor the stylistic one provide convincing arguments for considering them as long or short. It can only be stated that it most probably concerns 2 identical accents. GE and FE have short accents, while the second one is under the G note. EE has a vertical accent, only on the last note. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Vertical accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The clearly long accent in A was recreated as a short in GE. A short accent is also in FE. In EE the accent sign was omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The accent in A is undoubtedly long. In all editions it was rendered as short. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
The clearly long accent in A was recreated as short in GE and FE. In EE the accent was undoubtedly omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||
|
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major
..
In this context the long accent seems to be more plausible in terms of interpreting the sign in A. In GE there is a short accent (same as in the entire Impromptu), while in FE and EE the accents were omitted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
