Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 80

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
 
 
..

The clearly long accent in A was recreated in GE as a short one; the similar situation can be found in FE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 80

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

..

In EE the grace note at the beginning of the bar is non-slashed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Notation of grace notes

b. 80-81

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

..

We give the fingering added by Chopin in FES.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies

b. 81

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
 
 
..

In FED Chopin wrote the variant way of performing the arpeggio on the chord in the L.H. – with the added lower octave. We present a proposal of interpretation after the notation used by Chopin in the Etude in G major Op. 10 No. 5, bar 65.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Bass register changes , Abbreviated octaves' notation

b. 81

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

..

Lack of the naturals next to e2 and ein A and FE was added in GE (next to e1) and in EE (in both places). Chopin certainly considered the previously placed natural next to e3 as valid in the entire bar. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves