Issues : Errors of GC
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The version of GC (→GE) is almost certainly erroneous – the copyist could have copied it only from one of the remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, and it is absent both in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt IV
..
GC has a G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC and FE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The seventh in GC is certainly erroneous, however, without comparing it to other sources, it is unclear whether the mistake concerns the bottom or top note. It is proved by the way the place was revised in GE1. In the main text we give the undoubtedly correct text of FE, EE and GE2 (→GE3).
We add cautionary sharps before F category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
as the 10th quaver in the L.H. The mistake was corrected in 
returning b
returning g1. This patent error was corrected in 
1 in 
