Issues : Accidentals in different octaves
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In A (→FC,FE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
In A (→FC,FE1) there are no accidentals before the last semiquaver (in both hands), which, when interpreted literally, gives d1 and d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 18, Prelude in F minor
..
In A (→FC→GE) there are no naturals before d2 and b1, since Chopin considered the previous accidentals before d3 and b2 to be valid. In FE (→EE), in which the first part of the roulade was written without an octave sign, respective naturals were added. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions |
|
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The lack of naturals before the sixth on the 6. quaver is an undoubted oversight by Chopin in A (→FE). The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC and FE there are no sharps raising g2-g3 to g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
lowering e to e
in the last L.H. figure. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
was added, yet only in the R.H., where it is a cautionary accidental. 
2-g