Issues : EE revisions
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE1→EE2), there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. The undoubtedly necessary was added only just in GE3 and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 616
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of EE is almost certainly erroneous – the presence of a and a2 proves that from that moment on, Chopin heard again the E minor key and not F major. Interestingly, the reviser of EE did not react in the previous bar, in which he should have added the overlooked lowering f2 to f2. A cautionary before that note was added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 616
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 619
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Taking into account the fact that similar figures of accompaniment are provided with slurs in the entire section, the absence of slurs in the last two bars must be considered an inaccuracy. A slur in bar 619 was added already in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |