Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 619-620
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we adopt the enhanced notation, used in GE and EE. The notation of FE is probably earlier, since in the vast majority of similar bars it was changed by Chopin to the latter. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
|
b. 620
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accidental before the 4th semiquaver in FE (→GE1→GE2) must be an oversight – in such figures, enveloping the initial note like a grupetto (very frequent in Chopin's output), two bottommost notes constitute an interval of a minor or major second, but not augmented. We add a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 621
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 622
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The first three digits of the fingering given in bar 622 are repeated also in bar 625. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 623-627
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering given in bar 623 and 627 suggests beginning the trill from the top note, which seems to be questionable in this context. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
1 in 
, which is most likely in this place (cf. e.g. bar 220). The accidental was added already in 
