mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Terzverschreibung error

b. 367

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

c in FE (→GE)

e in EE
..

The version of EE is erroneous – cf. analogous bar 359; the mistake was probably caused by the similarity of subsequent triplets. In FEH, an annotation in the form of 'ut,' i.e. c, was written next to that note, which can be interpreted as a note that it is not an e.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FEH

b. 390

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Chord with c2 in A (→GE) & EE

Chord with a1 in FE
..

The version of FE with a tenth chord is certainly erroneous. The mistake was corrected in EE, most probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 46.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error

b. 420

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In the L.H. part, there are erroneous c​​​​​​​2-b1 semiquavers in GE1. A similar mistake was present also in FE; however, it was corrected therein, probably in the last phase of proofreading. The subsequent GE contain the correct text.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE

b. 424-425

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

GE1 has erroneously e1 as the last crotchet in b. 424. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3) by replacing it with a tied c1.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

d2 in FE (→GE) & EE2 (→EE3)

f2 in EE1
..

The version of EE1 seems to be a Terzver­schreibung error, revised by removing the , unnecessary next to f2. However, a transfer of the note could have also been intentional, under the influence of bar 431. Anyways, it was already in EE2 (→EE3) that the authentic d2 was restored.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Terzverschreibung error