Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 12

composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major

Semibreve in A (→FC,FEEE)

Minim in GE

..

Shortening the rhythmic value of c1 in GE was most probably motivated by the intention to make this bar consistent with the version of b. 4, which was considered to be more justified. Consequently, both bars in GE contain the wrong text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 12-13

composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor

Slurs in A

Slurs in FE (→EE)

Slurs in GE

..

The versions of the editions are arbitrary attempts at interpreting the seemingly illogical slurring of A (→FC). Indeed, one could assume that the notation of A is inaccurate due to the crossings-out in b. 12, which forced Chopin to rewrite the R.H. part on the stave above. According to us, it could have provoked an unintentional shortening of the phrase mark, which would justify the version of GE. However, in the main text we keep the notation of A, which could have equally been intended by Chopin – the f1-b1 crotchet guarantees legato at the end of the bar, while the last quaver (c2) belonging to the preceding phrase is not as obvious as it may seem.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , FE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor

..

This bar was entirely crossed out in A and rewritten on adjacent staves – the R.H. above the crossing-out, while the L.H. – below. In the readable initial version, the regular steps of the R.H. quavers and the position of the 1st L.H. chord are preserved, while the f1 notes are written enharmonically as e1: . The corrections had been performed before the performance marks were introduced – the crossed-out version did not contain the following elements: accent, staccato dots, phrase mark, dashes marking the range of crescendo and pedalling marks. The  restoring b1 on the 3rd beat of the bar was also missing.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes , Enharmonic corrections , Main-line changes

b. 12

composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor

Accent & staccato dots in A (→FEEE)

No marks in FC (→GE)

..

The missing accent and staccato dots in FC (→GE) are most probably an oversight of Fontana, particularly since the dots in A are very poorly visible in this bar. In turn, the missing accent could be related to Fontana's conviction that the accents in this theme refer to the R.H. – see the note in b. 4 – hence he did not expect such marks while copying the L.H. part.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of FC

b. 12-13

composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor

..

In A (→FC,FE) there is no accidental before the 4th semiquaver in the 3rd group, which would result in f2, which is impossible in this context. The oversight of a cancelled alteration, frequently encountered in Chopin's music, was corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE