Issues : EE inaccuracies
b. 4-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In A in bar 4 (and bar 12, which repeats this bar) the hairpins embrace with their range the 2nd and 3rd chords in the bar. This is how it was more or less reproduced in FE, yet minor inaccuracies caused that in GE the sign in bar 12 was given a form of an accent, while in EE in both bars it was printed one quaver too early. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 5-9
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
Missing in bars 5 and 9 in EE are the staccato dots under D. This is probably the engraver's fault. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The sources do not state clearly which quaver is affected by the sign. One can choose between the 2nd quaver, as it is in FE and as GE interpreted the unclear sign of GC (it could have been assigned to the rest of the L.H., falling on the 2nd quaver or apply it to the 3rd, or even the 4th quaver of the bar), or the beginning of the bar, as EE interpreted the notation of FE. The piano and sound reality make us consider both versions to be possible. In the main text we reproduce the notation of the base source, i.e. FE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the absence of [A], it is difficult to determine whether the curved line over the g notes in FE (→GE,EE) is a tie sustaining those notes or a motivic slur (in Chopin's autographs, the differentiation is possible due to the shape of the curved lines). According to us, it is a motivic slur that is more likely here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Tie or slur |
|||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In all sources, 3 subsequent accents in bars 5-6 are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of the engraver and suggest long accents in the main text:
category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |