|
b. 667-670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the middle notes of the tremolando that double the trill are devoid of extending dots. The inaccuracy was corrected in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
||||||||
|
b. 667
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
EE added cautionary naturals before the B1-B octave and the b2 minim. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 667
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The marcato indication almost certainly refers to the thematic motif in the L.H., which is indicated by the meaning of that indication and by a comparison with analogous bar 229. Engravers would often misplace indications and other marks or assign them to the wrong hand. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 667-670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we prolong the wavy lines emphasising the duration of the trills. Neither the range of the wavy lines nor the fact whether they were used in the notation at all influences the performance manner of the trill, hence we choose the most suggestive notation. Chopin would write longer, continuous trills in various ways – cf. e.g. the Waltz in D category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 668-670
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing cresc. - - - indication in GE may mean that Chopin added it in the last proofreading of FE. In EE, the indication was divided into syllables. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
& 
Major, Op. 64 No. 1, bars 
