mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 661-689

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

category imprint:

b. 662-663

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

c2 repeated in A (→FC→GE1)

c2 tied in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)
..

The tie of c2, probably overlooked in A (→FC→GE1) in b. 211-212 (the discussed bars are a repetition thereof), was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE) as well as – probably by analogy with b. 79-80 – in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 663

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering in FE (→EE)

No fingering in GE
..

The fingering of the L.H. was added by Chopin most probably in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 664

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No marking in A (→FE→EE)

in FC (→GE)
..

Chopin added the  indication in FC (→GE) in b. 213, and the discussed bar is a repetition thereof.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 664-665

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No indication in A (→FE→EE)

dolce in bar 664 in FC (→GE1)

dolce in bar 665 in GE2 (→GE3)
..

According to Chopin, these bars were supposed to be an exact repetition of b. 213-214. Therefore, in the main text we give the dolce indication in b. 664, in accordance with the Chopinesque entry in b. 213 in FC (→GE1). In subsequent GE the indication was arbitrarily moved to b. 665, probably by analogy with b. 81-82.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions