mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 634-636

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Long accents in EE & FE

Short accents in GC (→GE)
..

In the main text the chord are covered with long accents based on EE and FE. The GC notation is not completely unclear, however it seems more probable to read the marks as short accents. Such is the interpretation of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 634

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE, one can see traces of correction of the 2nd quaver from g1 to e1.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 635-636

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

Pedalling in GC (→GE) must have been omitted.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of GC

b. 636

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

A sharp raising c2 to c​​​​​​​2 appears in FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE1→EE2) only just before the 4th quaver of the bottom voice. Chopin would write an accidental too late on a few occasions (e.g. in the Etude in F Major, Op. 10 No. 8, bar 43). An accidental at the beginning of the bar was added in EE3 and GE3, yet it was only GE3 that removed the  in the middle of the bar, unnecessary in this situation.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 636-637

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slurs in FE (→EE)

Slurs in GE
..

The slurs of FE (→EE) are probably inaccurate, since it is difficult to find a reason that would justify their different range – cf. bars 621-629 and the remaining ones in this fragment. However, it has to be said that if it were not for the ratio of the number of one type of the slurs to the other, it would be the slurs of FE, encompassing the entire motifs, that could be considered to be more accurate. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions