Issues : Errors of GC
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The lack of slur under the bass progression results most likely from an oversight of the copyist in GC (→GE) and the engraver of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 155
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The structure of the figuration in the entire passage in the L.H. (bars 153-156 and 157-160), and particularly the comparison with analogous bar 159, indicate a mistake of the copyist in this place. The absence of a correction in GE may be attributed to the absent before this note (although in a similar situation four bars later, a before the respective note – c2 – was added). The sign is absent also in the majority of the sources featuring the note at the correct pitch – it was added only in EE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Terzverschreibung error , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 156
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 156
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
At the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar before the bottom note of the second, GC and FE1 (→FE2) have one before each of the notes instead of . This easy to detect mistake – none of these flats is necessary at this pitch, whereas a1 appears in the part of the L.H. – was corrected in GE, by adding another before the bottom note. The correct notation is included in FE3 (→FE4) and EE, which in both cases could have been a result of Chopin's intervention. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
b. 157-158
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slurs in GC (→GE1) must be an oversight – the copyist wrote only the part of the slur starting in b. 158, at the beginning of a new line, overlooking the slurring of b. 157. GE2 limited itself to adding slurs in b. 157 (most probably by analogy with b. 153) – the already printed slur in b. 158 was left unchanged. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC , Uncertain slur continuation |