|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In FE the type of the accent in bar 9 (short or long) is not obvious – in GE it was reproduced as short, in EE – as long. In FE (→GE,EE) the short accent in bar 10 was overlooked. In FED Chopin added a long accent in bar 9, confirming the printed sign. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 9-15
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI bar 8 is marked as 1ma [volta], after which bar 16 follows, marked as 2[da volta]. However, after bar 8, instead of the expected repeat sign, there is a double bar line. In spite of this inaccuracy, there is no doubt that bars 9-15 are meant to be repetition of bars 1-7. A double bar line appears also after bar 16. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 9-16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The slurs in these bars – despite being justified from the point of view of the performance – do not appear in the sources controlled by Chopin in terms of publication (A, FE). We do not include them in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In AI there are no verbal indications concerning dynamics, articulation or tempo. Cf. the note to bars 7-8. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In EE six digits of Chopin's fingering were completed with an additional '1' at the beginning of the 4th group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
