Issues : Changes of metre
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 1-14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In AT the Etude is written in 2/4 time signature, in two times smaller values – semiquaver triplets in the R.H. and quaver triplets in the L.H. It is the original concept, abandoned by Chopin not later than at the time of writing AW. The triplets of the L.H. do not have slurs in AT, which was probably related to the fact that the triplet grouping of the quavers unambiguously results from their beams. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Changes of metre |
|||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The use of time signature is not surprising only in GE1, as FE does not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, neither in Op. 10 nor in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature does not raise any doubts thanks to A (→FC). The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The use of time signature surprises only in GE1, as FE did not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – even once, neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10 and the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable with respect to the compatible version of FC and EE. The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
The use of the time signature is surprising only in EE, as in FE the time signature was not used in the Etudes even once – contrary to the manuscripts – neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10, in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). Anyways, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature written by Chopin in A (→GE) is beyond any doubt. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in FE , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The use of the time signature is surprising only in GE1, as FE did not use the indication in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – even once, neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10 and in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). Anyways, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable with respect to the compatible version of GC and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »