data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The use of the time signature is surprising only in EE, as in FE the
time signature was not used in the Etudes even once – contrary to the manuscripts – neither in Op. 25 nor in Op. 10, in the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. the Impromptu in A
major, Op. 29). Anyways, the correctness and authenticity of the
time signature written by Chopin in A (→GE) is beyond any doubt.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Changes of metre, Inaccuracies in FE, 4/4 or 2/2
notation: Rhythm