|
b. 167-168
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The semiquaver opening the bassoon motif was given the form of a slashed grace note in GE, which could have been influenced by the notation of A, in which the grace note is unusually small. On the other hand, in A it is written as a semiquaver, in accordance with the rhythm in Morch in the part of bassoon, which is playing this motif. Therefore, it is unlikely that a grace note would be compliant with Chopin's intention. The reason for the change could have been formal rhythmic correctness, since due to the lack of rests before this note, only a grace note fits smoothly between three crotchets of this bar. In turn, it is difficult to say what the motivation of the person (Chopin?) who changed the grace note to a quaver in FE (→#EE) was. In the main text we choose the undoubtedly authentic notation of A, adding the rest overlooked by Chopin for the record. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary naturals before g2 and g1 were added in GE (→FE→EE). It could have been performed at Chopin's request. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 167-168
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Beginning a slur from the second note of the bassoon motif is certainly an inaccuracy of GE1, repeated in all subsequent editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 167
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Differently than in analogous bars 161-166 and 168, in GE both slurs begin from the 2nd quaver in the group. It is almost certainly a result of proofreading – probably a Chopin one – since the slurs of A, particularly the second one, are exceptionally inaccurate here. The difference in slurring was not included in FE (→EE), which may be explained by distraction or a unifying revision. It is also possible that the slurs in GE1 were changed in the last phase of proofreading, already after the copies had been sent to Paris. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , FE revisions |
in 
in 
