|
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of pedalling in a part of the editions is undoubtedly a consequence of an oversight of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
GE does not have b in the chord on the 3rd quaver in the bar. It is probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
GE has an additional c1 note on the last quaver in the bar. It is most probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In such a context, the staccato dots written over the R.H. (as it is in A, GE and FE) are valid also in the L.H. In the main text, we suggest adding signs in the L.H. due to the added accents in the previous bar and change of the placement of the dots in the R.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 188-189
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A was indeed written with two moves, yet interpreting it as two slurs is, according to us, an unnecessary complication, incompatible with Chopin's intention. It may be that GE1 initially printed only one of the slurs, so that adding a second was a correction of a patent mistake – cf. bars 190-192. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
