b. 187
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
There is a over the trill in FE (→EE). It would make sense only if the trilled note were a c2, which is almost certainly erroneous in this case. Therefore, the sign was most probably added by the reviser of FE in the last phase of proofreading, since the was not included in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 187-193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In this context, the absence of pedalling markings undoubtedly indicates the use of the indications given in analogous figures in the previous bars, which is confirmed by the markings written by Chopin in the recapitulation (bars 542-547). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 187-191
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like at the beginning of this section (bar 179), Fontana's fingering coincides with the one indicated by Chopin during lessons. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 187
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the slurs of similar figures of this section (from bar 179) proves that the slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is inaccurate, which, actually, could have had its origin in the careless notation of [A]. In the main text, we include the corresponding correction introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 187
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE (→EE1) is doubly incomplete:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE |