



b. 141-142
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
EE unified the font of the accents in these bars, by arbitrarily changing two long accents in bar 142 and the vertical accent in bar 143 to common, short accents. It is particularly strange in the case of the vertical accent, since it was the signs with which EE would eagerly replace Chopin short or long accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Four digits of Chopin fingering were added to FED. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the entire bar, added in EE, is probably inauthentic in this place. It was supposedly drawn from analogous bar 289, where its authenticity is also uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 141
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
All staccato dots in the part of the L.H. were overlooked in GE1. When proofreading FE (→EE), Chopin added signs only next to bass notes, which we consider his final decision. Analogous bar 289, whose regular notation of the part of the R.H. seems to be more mature, includes dots in the L.H. only under E category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 141-144
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we give the version of A (→GE→FE→EE). However, Morch has a different rhythmic and articulation solution in the viola and cello parts:
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |