



Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 301
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 301-302
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The comparison with analogous bar 135 suggests that the A slurs are inaccurate here, particularly the one that ends on the last crotchet in bar 301. The beginning of the slur in bar 302 is written with a flourish, yet its shape quite convincingly indicates that it is related to the e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
b. 302-304
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The evident long accents in A in the middle of bars 302 and 304 were reproduced in GE (→FE) as short ones, whereas in EE they were changed to vertical. It is certain that none of the changes comes from Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 302-305
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The quavers opening these bars are provided with clear wedges in A. Reproducing them as staccato dots is a very frequent inaccuracy of GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
|||||||||||
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The meaning of the slur, which in A clearly concerns the top L.H. voice, is unclear in GE1 (→GE2) – one can see it as a slightly too short tie to the F crotchet at the end of the 1st beat of the bar or an inaccurate slur encompassing three thirds in the top voice. The first interpretation was adopted by FE1 (→FE2) and EE, while the second – by FESB. In GE3 the slur combines the F crotchet with the c-e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , FE revisions |