|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE the bottom note of the 1st crotchet is an erroneous f1 instead of a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
It is hard to state how con forza written in A would become con fuoco in FE (→GE,EE). In the editors opinion a mistake in reading the manuscript is quite probable. However, we keep the published version in the main text because Chopin undoubtedly controlled the performance indications while proofreading FE – i.a. he added just con forza in bar 15 – and did not change anything at the place under discussion. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Accidental below/above the note |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the absence of [A], it is difficult to determine whether the curved line over the g notes in FE (→GE,EE) is a tie sustaining those notes or a motivic slur (in Chopin's autographs, the differentiation is possible due to the shape of the curved lines). According to us, it is a motivic slur that is more likely here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Tie or slur |
|||||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
To the main text we adopt the Chopinesque fingering, written in pencil in FEJ. category imprint: Differences between sources |
1 – cf. analogous bar 329 as well as similar situations in bars 11, 13, 27, 29 and analog., which always include a
e
