b. 5-13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 6, Etude in E♭ minor
..
In bars 5 and 13 it is not certain whether the difference between the indications (accents, hairpins) of A and FE (→GE,EE) is a result of the engraver's inaccuracy or Chopin's intervention. In the main text we propose coherent indications of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In A the accent in bar 5 is significantly longer than the one in bar 6 (similarly in bars 9-10). A minor difference was reproduced only in EE, which is probably a fortuitous coincidence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 5-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The whole-bar long slurs of EE are an arbitrary addition of the reviser who simply copied the authentic slurs from bars 1-4. The revision includes bars 5-11 in EE3 and in EE4 also bars 12-14. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In bar 5 and in the 1st half of bar 6, in AI, instead of part of the L.H., there is come sopra, which, in this context, undoubtedly refers to bars 1-2 and means repetition of the notation of the first three groups of semiquavers. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The hook at the bottom of the natural raising d3 to d3, resulting from haste while writing A, was initially interpreted in FE as a flat before f2. The mistake was then corrected. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |